Reassessing Islamic Hedging Fatwa in Indonesia: Accounting, Regulation, and Market Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/share.0041Keywords:
Fatwa, Islamic Hedging, Murabahah, PSAK, Wa’dAbstract
Exchange rate volatility remains a major challenge for businesses, including institutions operating within the Islamic financial system. In Indonesia, Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia Fatwa No. 96/DSN-MUI/IV/2015 serves as the primary reference for Sharia-compliant hedging transactions. However, concerns related to Sharia compliance, inconsistencies between regulations and market practices, and limited understanding of operational hedging mechanisms continue to hinder the development of the Islamic derivatives market. This study examines the reliability and practical applicability of the Fatwa through the perspective of PSAK Syariah, relevant regulations, and foreign exchange market practices. Using a qualitative approach, the study employs content analysis, comparative analysis, and critical analysis of the Fatwa and related accounting standards. The findings show that the Fatwa contains four hedging mechanisms: Aqd al-Tahawwuth al-Basith (ATB), al-Murakkab (ATM), and Aqd al-Tahawwuth fi Suq al-Sil’ah (ATFSS) Mechanism-1 and Mechanism-2. Among them, ATB, ATM, and ATFSS-1 are operationally capable of producing actual currency settlement, although ATFSS-1 introduces financing and operational complexities that reduce efficiency. Meanwhile, ATFSS-2 does not result in actual currency exchange because settlement occurs through netting. The study also identifies several misalignments between the Fatwa, accounting standards, financial regulations, and prevailing market practices, which may weaken the effectiveness and practical benefits of Sharia hedging transactions. This study contributes a new analytical framework for assessing the reliability and alignment of Sharia rulings with accounting governance, regulatory structures, and market realities in a dual banking environment.
ABSTRAK - Menilai Ulang Fatwa Lindung Nilai Syariah di Indonesia: Akuntansi, Regulasi, dan Praktik Pasar. Volatilitas nilai tukar masih menjadi tantangan besar bagi dunia usaha, termasuk lembaga yang beroperasi dalam sistem keuangan syariah. Di Indonesia, Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia No. 96/DSN-MUI/IV/2015 menjadi rujukan utama transaksi lindung nilai berbasis syariah. Namun demikian, persoalan kepatuhan syariah, ketidakselarasan antara regulasi dan praktik pasar, serta keterbatasan pemahaman mengenai mekanisme lindung nilai masih menghambat perkembangan pasar derivatif syariah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menelaah keandalan dan daya terap Fatwa melalui perspektif PSAK Syariah, regulasi terkait, dan praktik pasar valuta asing. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis isi, analisis komparatif, dan analisis kritis terhadap Fatwa serta standar akuntansi terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Fatwa memuat empat mekanisme lindung nilai, yaitu Aqd al-Tahawwuth al-Basith (ATB), al-Murakkab (ATM), serta Aqd al-Tahawwuth fi Suq al-Sil’ah (ATFSS) Mekanisme-1 dan Mekanisme-2. ATB, ATM, dan ATFSS-1 terbukti mampu menghasilkan penyelesaian transaksi valuta asing secara nyata, meskipun ATFSS-1 menimbulkan kompleksitas pembiayaan dan operasional yang mengurangi efisiensi transaksi. Sebaliknya, ATFSS-2 tidak menghasilkan pertukaran valuta asing secara riil karena penyelesaian dilakukan melalui mekanisme netting. Penelitian ini juga menemukan adanya ketidakselarasan antara Fatwa, standar akuntansi, regulasi keuangan, dan praktik pasar yang dapat mengurangi efektivitas serta manfaat praktis transaksi lindung nilai syariah. Penelitian ini menawarkan kerangka analitis untuk menilai keselarasan fatwa syariah dengan tata kelola akuntansi, regulasi, dan praktik pasar dalam sistem perbankan ganda.
References
AAOIFI. (2017). Shari’ah standards. Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions.
Alfidyah, M. (2025). Pengaruh penerapan standar akuntansi keuangan terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan pada perusahaan publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Sistem Informasi, 1(1), 1–7. http://pustakajurnal.web.id/index.php/jasi
Al Natoor, B., & Shawqi, S. (2020, June 17). Islamic derivatives increasingly necessary, but constraints remain. Fitch Ratings. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/islamic-finance/islamic-derivatives-increasingly-necessary-constraints-remain-17-06-2020
Alvi, I. A. (2019). ISDA–IIFM Islamic hedging standards (Seminar presentation). International Islamic Financial Market & Bank Indonesia. https://isef.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ISEF_2019_ISDA-IIFM-Hedging-Standards-Ijlal-A-Alvi-IIFM.pdf
Ascarya. (2006). Akad dan produk bank syariah: Konsep dan praktik di beberapa negara. Bank Indonesia.
Awaludin, & Febrian, A. (2020). Kedudukan fatwa DSN MUI dalam transaksi keuangan pada lembaga keuangan syariah di Indonesia. Al Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i2.3366
Bacha, O. I. (1999). Derivative instruments and Islamic finance: Some thoughts for a reconsideration. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 1(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23786773
Bakhtawar, B., Latif, F., Murschetz, P. C., & Kamal, A. (2023). Content niching of AM/FM vs. digital only audio media in Pakistan. International Journal on Media Management, 24(4), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2023.2183501
BI. (2008). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 10/38/PBI/2008 tentang transaksi derivatif. Bank Indonesia.
BI. (2014). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 16/16/PBI/2014 tentang transaksi valuta asing terhadap rupiah antara bank dan pihak domestik. Bank Indonesia.
BI. (2016). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 18/2/PBI/2016 tentang transaksi lindung nilai berdasarkan prinsip syariah. Bank Indonesia.
BI. (2024a). Peraturan Anggota Dewan Gubernur Nomor 11 Tahun 2024. Bank Indonesia.
BI. (2024b). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 6/2024 tentang pasar uang dan pasar valuta asing. Bank Indonesia.
BIS-ACC. (2022). Foreign exchange markets in Asia-Pacific. Bank for International Settlements, Asian Consultative Council
BSI (2025). Transfer valas. Bank Syariah Indonesia. https://www.bankbsi.co.id
C. T. Bauer College of Business. (2024). Foreign exchange markets (Teaching materials). University of Houston.
Cantú, C., & Chui, M. (2020). Financial market development and financial stability. BIS Papers, 113, 19–38. https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap113_b_rh.pdf
DSN-MUI. (2002). Fatwa No. 28/DSN MUI/III/2002 tentang akad jual beli mata uang (al sharf). Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia
DSN-MUI. (2011). Fatwa No. 82/DSN MUI/VIII/2011 tentang perdagangan komoditi berdasarkan prinsip syariah. Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia
DSN-MUI. (2015). Fatwa No. 96/DSN MUI/IV/2015 tentang transaksi lindung nilai syariah. Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia
DSN-MUI. (2017). Fatwa No. 110/DSN MUI/IX/2017 tentang akad jual beli. Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia
FSB. (2021). Peer review of Indonesia. Financial Stability Board. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P260221.pdf
Hasyim, S. (2019). Fatwas and democracy: Majelis Ulama Indonesia and rising conservatism. TRaNS, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.13
Hidayati, T., Hidayatullah, M. S., Komarudin, P., & Atika, A. (2023). Digitalization of Islamic finance: Epistemological study of DSN MUI fatwa. Al Ahkam, 33(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.2.17324
HKMA. (2017). Supervisory policy manual: Counterparty credit risk management (CR G 13). Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
IAI. (2020). Akuntansi keuangan syariah. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia
IAI. (2023). SAK syariah for academics: Islamic hedging. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
IAI. (2024a). PSAK 402: Akuntansi murabahah. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
IAI. (2024b). PSAK 411: Akuntansi wa‘d. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
IAI. (2025). PSAK 401: Penyajian laporan keuangan syariah. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
IFSA. (2013). Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (Act 759). Government of Malaysia
IFSB. (2024). Islamic financial services industry stability report. Islamic Financial Services Board.
Intrac. (2017). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Intrac for Civil Society.
Juma, M. A. A. M. S. (2018). The operational framework of Islamic derivatives. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 2(2), 213–223.
Komarudin, P., & Hidayatullah, M. S. (2021). Analisis qiyas transaksi tawarruq. Nukhbatul ‘Ulum, 7(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v7i1.317
Lubis, N. R., Balqis, T., & Nurlaila. (2023). Peran PSAK syariah dalam meningkatkan kualitas penyajian laporan keuangan. Masharif al Syariah, 8(2), 1145–1154.
Majka, M. (2024). Understanding hedging: Strategies, benefits, and risks. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383786278
Mihalescu, M. (2019). Content analysis: A digital method. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333756046_Content_analysis
Mikou, S., et al. (2024). Liquidity risk management in Islamic banks. European Journal of Management and Business Studies, 29, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.32038/mbrq.2024.29.04
Mogashoa, T. (2014). Understanding critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1(7), 104–113. https://www.arcjournals.org/ article/9921
Moosa, R. (2023). An overview of Islamic accounting: The murabaha contract. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070335
Muhtadi, Rodoni, A., & Amelia, E. (2023). Implementasi penggunaan lindung nilai (hedging) syariah untuk menghadapi ketidakpastian di Indonesia. Jurnal Niara, 16(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.31849/niara.v16i1.13932
Nafis, M. C. (2023). Kedudukan MUI dalam perundang undangan. Paper presented at Workshop Pra Ijtima’ Sanawi (Annual Meeting) DPS VIII, 7 September 2023.
OCBC Bank. (2023). Pasar valuta asing: Fungsi, pelaku, jenis, dan contohnya. https://www.ocbc.id/id/article/2022/12/28/pasar-valuta-asing-adalah
OJK. (2023). Pedoman produk pembiayaan murabahah perbankan syariah. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Pedoman-Produk-Pembiayaan-Murabahah.aspx
Oranga, J., & Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative research: Essence, types, and advantages. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e11001. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001
Purba, I. E., Simaremare, R., Harefa, H. J., Siburian, S., & Aruan, H. M. G. P. (2025). Standar akuntansi keuangan di Indonesia. Economics and Digital Business Review, 6(2), 1636–1643. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v6i2.2725
Salahuddin, M. (2017). Konsep maqashid syariah dalam fatwa ekonomi DSN MUI. LP2M UIN Mataram.
Sari, N., Ibrahim, A., Muzammil, M., & Muksal, M. (2024). Managing financing risk of Islamic banking products in Indonesia: A value at risk approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 24(1), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v24i1.17693
Shabri, H. (2022). Eksplorasi transaksi derivatif dalam keuangan Islam. Al Bank: Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 2(2), 129–138. http://ojs.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/ index.php/Albank
Shenton, K. A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Shofawati, A. (2014). Murabahah financing in Islamic banking: Case study in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 5th Asia Pacific Business Research Conference (pp. xx–xx). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://www.isfin.net/sites/isfin.com/files/murabahah_financing_in_ islamic_banking-case_study in_indonesia.pdf
Siregar, R. Y., & Ronaldo, R. R. (2023). Indonesia’s exchange rate: Fundamental value & path (Economic Bulletin, Issue 34). IFG Progress Financial Group. https://ifgprogress.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Economic-Bulletin-Issue-34-Indonesias-Equilibrium-Exchange-Rate-Discovering-Rupiahs-Fundamental-Value.pdf
Wybieralski, P. (2023). Pre settlement risk limits in OTC derivatives markets. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Skłodowska, Sectio H, 57(1), 219–235.
XE.com. (2025). US dollar to Indonesian rupiah exchange rate chart. https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=IDR&view=10Y
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Zahan, M., & Kenett, R. S. (2012). Hedging instruments in conventional and Islamic finance. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 3(1), 59–74.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rovila El Maghviroh, Indra Suwandi, Nurdina Nurdina (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
SHARE allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and to retain the publishing rights without restrictions. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal a right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work



